Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Six Reasons Why Everything in Publishing Takes So Long

Publishing takes so long because . . .

1. Because each book is individual.

The beautiful and difficult thing about publishing is that it's a one-to-one industry:  one writer connecting to one reader at a time. And because everything is individual, there are absolutely zilch solid rules in this business (beyond "Have a sense of humor" and "Don't be a jerk"). Each author is different; each manuscript is different; each editor is different; each agent is different; each publishing house is different. No matter how many books an editor and author have worked on together, each new manuscript has to be considered on its own strengths, with its own problems. 

Aesthetically terrible books get published and make a ton of money; aesthetically brilliant books win the National Book Award; other aesthetically terrible books cost their publishers piles of cash with very little return; other aesthetically brilliant books disappear completely. In adult publishing, Alice Sebold, Charles Frazier, Audrey Niffenegger and Sara Gruen (to pick four names in a very common pattern) all experienced incredible success with their first novels, leading to advances for their second novels in the multiple millions; and not one of those second novels has achieved the success of their previous books. Markus Zusak and The Book Thief ended up on Good Morning America because a smart Knopf publicist sent a copy directly to Charlie Gibson, who happened to open his own mail that day, became fascinated with the book, and took it home to read over the weekend. There's no way to guarantee that happening again, and thus it illustrates my point:  Every book is individual, and a success not easily replicable.   

(N.B. An earlier version of this post misstated the nature of the Zusak-GMA connection, which was kindly corrected by a Random House insider. This blog regrets the error.) 

2. Because editors and agents have many submissions to wade through, because . . .
2A. . . . The barriers to being a writer who submits manuscripts are extremely low.

This is not a complaint or an accusation or anything pejorative, just a factual observation:  Writing is an individual pursuit, that anyone who is literate can participate in, with extremely low technological requirements (as technological requirements go in the modern age). As a result, all you need to write and submit a manuscript is the ability to write in English, access to a computer with word-processing software, and an Internet account so you can send out the resulting manuscript. (You no longer even need a printer! Or stamps!) So a lot of people can participate in this process, and do.

2B. . . . Writers vastly outnumber editors and agents — especially when writers multiply submit.

We are also living in an unprecedented age of access to information about publishers and editors and agents, thanks to the Internet, Amazon, acknowledgment pages, writers’ discussion boards, QueryTracker, you name it. This makes it extremely easy for writers to research places to submit their work, and to send forth manuscripts accordingly to all the places they find.

I am not complaining about multiple submissions, please note; I understand why writers and agents do it, and those reasons are 100% valid. But if we think of the amount of time spent reading a query as quantity X, then one writer submitting to one agent equals a reading time of X across the whole industry. One writer submitting to six agents equals 6X across the industry. Six writers submitting to six agents each equals 36X (though note we still have just those same six agents doing six times the work) . . . and so it all grows exponentially, and crowds out the time for other things within the industry. Again, these are not complaints, just facts.

2C. . . . Reading is inherently not fast.

The very smart Jason Pinter once wrote something on Twitter like, "The average person reads 250 words per minute -- 60 pages an hour. If you give someone your 350-page manuscript, you're asking them to spend the length of a flight from New York to California with you talking to them." His point was that you should do your best to be sure that you're good company, which is true. But no matter how good the company is, it takes a lot more than just sitting down to listen to a three-minute song, or watch a 30-minute TV show. . . . I have days when I wish I could fly back and forth from New York to California to get all my reading done. 

3. Because each book has both aesthetic and economic factors that must be carefully weighed at each step in the process.

I remember once in my first year as an editorial assistant, I fell in love with a picture-book manuscript and took it in to my afternoon meeting with Arthur. “I love this manuscript,” I said. “Will you read it right now?”

“Sure, leave it with me,” he said.

“It’s not even two complete pages,” I said. “Can’t you just look at it?”

“No, I can’t,” he said patiently. “Leave it here and we’ll talk about it tomorrow.”

Now that I’ve had manuscripts thrust at me at conferences, and been that editor facing an intern with a great manuscript in hand, I understand where he was coming from. Because each manuscript — even a two-hundred-word picture book text — presents an editor with a series of questions to be answered, to wit:

  1. Is this any good in an aesthetic sense?
  2. Is it of any interest in a publishing sense? 
  3. Is it appropriate for our publishing house?
  4. Do I like this?*
  5. If it is some good aesthetically, but not perfect, what parts aren't working?
  6. Can those parts be made to work?
  7. Assuming yes to question #6: Are the good parts good enough, and the publishing interest strong enough, to justify the editorial time and energy in trying to make it work?
  8. Assuming yes to question #7:  Is this strong enough as it is to try to acquire it? Or should I request a noncontractual revision? 
  9. Is the author capable of revising it? (Some writers simply are no good at revising.) 
  10. Is s/he someone we'll want to work with for the long term or just this book?
  11. How much do we think the book will sell?
  12. Following on #11, how much should we pay for it?
  13. Assuming no to question #7:  How should this be rejected?
  14. If it’s a picture book:  Who could or should illustrate it? What is Dream Illustrator's schedule like? How much would we have to pay him/her? Etc.
Sometimes those answers come very quickly:  If the answer to the first three and sometimes four questions are “no,” everything else is simple. But naming the bad parts takes time; writing a letter to the author takes time; figuring out whether the book is of publishing interest or whether, say, five other books on the same topic have just been published takes time. And of course, just plain reading the manuscript takes time!

And if I do decide I want to acquire it, there's a whole other to-do list after that (and then another one after that), which keeps coming back to evaluating the book's artistic and publishing strengths and how they can be maximized. Publishing is an extremely long-term game, and long-term games aren't fast.

* N. B. Many years ago, back when I was an assistant with time to do freelance editing, an author I was working with said, "I have the feeling you don't like my book." I realized then that I didn't care whether I liked the project, actually, because I was committed to editing it either way; I cared only whether the book worked, whether it accomplished the task it was meant to do, because then the book (and my work) would have been successful, and my personal feelings about the project were irrelevant. It's very different from my job now, where, if I'm going to put in all the time and effort that I do put in to a manuscript, and stand before my acquisitions committee, sales force, and the world and say, "You should pay attention to this," I want to feel emotionally connected to the project, and to feel like it's worthy of that attention.

4. Because each draft is a wholly new artistic work and must be considered as such.

I can't just read the two chapters or five lines that were changed from the previous draft to this; I have to consider them in the context of the whole, to see how the whole makes me feel now, and therefore whether the revision is working. (This is not so true in later stages of novels, after I've read the book six times and we're polishing moments; but it is true early on, and always true with picture books.) Then see #2C above.

5. Because what is individual is often deeply personal, and people deserve kindness. 

I love my authors, and I often know their spouses’ names, their children’s names, where they’re from, when they’re going on vacation and where. When I have bad news, I want to present it to them in the kindest and most supportive way possible. When I have good news, I want to celebrate with them in a way that feels present. I have relationships with agents, and I want to give them smart feedback on projects so they'll keep thinking I'm worth submitting to even when I say no (as I frequently must). When I read manuscripts, I'm very aware that every one is a little piece of the writer's soul there on the page for me -- like a good Horcrux -- and that if I'm turning it down, I need to do so with at least politeness. In a world that grows ever more rushed and demanding, time spent is a compliment, and I want to pay that compliment to the people who are important to me.

6. Because we're trying to make beautiful things that matter here and share them with other people who will love them too.

And that takes time, in the writing and thinking and editing and painting and copywriting and publicizing and selling and reading and telling; and that's all there is to it.

49 comments:

  1. I couldn't agree more and wouldn't have it any other way---except with me eing published, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a fabulous, well-thought out post. Thank you, Cheryl!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Really interesting post! Love your focus on kindness (#5) - a little goes a long way, that's for sure :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. This post was meant to find me tonight. Thank you. <3

    ReplyDelete
  6. This post made my day. As an author who can feel separate from whatever goes on far away in NY, it was touching to think of all that love, care, and time on the other end. I'm glad it takes long. It should.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really appreciate this post, and how genuinely you strive on this blog to help writers understand what happens "on the other side." Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fabulous post, and I love number six the most. We all want to make beautiful things that matter.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very interesting post. Took my mind back to May last year when I wrote a post on a similar theme and ended with the words, "Written in response to a question on my previous blog post about Deadly Nevergreen (coming out in 2012)..."

    The book mentioned was released at the beginning of this month and had been with us even in May 2011 for a little while waiting to take its turn :)

    I think a book can be regarded like a baby. It will be ready when it is ready - if it is out before its time there will be problems. Sometimes serious, sometimes you get away with it - but it is always better to let things take their course if at all possible.



    ReplyDelete
  10. Cheryl,
    Your #5 makes me wish I wrote children's books! By and large, I've found most people in the industry are actually kind. It's often hard for writers to understand that, because our non-writing lives teach us that people who say "no" are being unkind, when a "no" from a thoughtful agent is often the kindest option. Kindness also makes good business sense. Your clients are lucky to work with someone like you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. When I worked as an editor, I had one boss who would say that we "hand-crafted" books, and it's so true. Good, lovely, incredible books shouldn't be rushed. Books that are remembered and re-re-read and become classics become so because people at every stage along the way took time to make sure the final book would be amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. LOVE this post. So much great info here. Thank you for sharing, Cheryl! When I get non-writer friends asking me why things take so long from contract to publication, I am just going to point them to your post. :-) -- Debbie

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for the post. Gives us a look "behind the scenes" of book selection. Makes me even more thankful to my publisher for picking my book from the slush pile. :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Excellent post. thank you for mystifying the process. always good to get perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  15. great post. I'm a fan of demystifying the process and this goes a LONG way to pulling back the veil for writers and readers (especially readers that say "Why is the book $20?!)

    ReplyDelete
  16. your blog posts need share buttons :)

    ReplyDelete
  17. You're right, Evan. The cost of the book is not equivalent to printing and distribution. It reflects years of work by the author and the publisher/editors.

    I've often felt that readers should slow down - to give proper respect to the endless hours that have gone into preparing what they consume. It's like an Olympic moment: years of preparation over in seconds.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wonderful post specially since people/writers/potential writers always want to see the publisher/editor as the villain.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes! I read something like this and I am so encouraged for the future of publishing. THIS is what we are trying to do--create things of beauty that will last.

    Well said on everything.

    Shelley

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is terrific. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes.

    Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thank you for this. I often used to get frustrated with the "process", as it were and feel that maybe my work was just universally disliked. I have to admit though, when my publisher folded, it is partly because of the difficulty in a) being patient enough to wait for it and b) knowing that it's harder these days than ever to get an agent/publisher to take on new artists, that I started to self publish instead. I don't regret my choice, but I think I understand a bit better now how much publishers have to go through in obtaining new clients and keeping old ones. It's encouraging to hear how very personally you treat your clients. If only everyone in the industry was this thoughtful.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This is thoughtful, excellent and most kind of you. Thank you, Miss Cheryl.

    ReplyDelete
  23. All this is useful, but what if you are a nonfiction author writing on a timely topic? Delays risk losing the opportunity to hit the market first (as I was successful in doing with my most recent title). That's where my impatience tends to get the best of me.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Yup, to all the above^. Books are not hotcakes.

    ReplyDelete
  25. >>I realized then that I didn't care whether I liked the project, actually, because I was committed to editing it either way; I cared only whether the book worked, whether it accomplished the task it was meant to do, because then the book (and my work) would have been successful, and my personal feelings about the project were irrelevant.<<

    And this is exactly why a freelance for-hire editor, no matter how skilled and committed and professional, is never going to quite do the same quality of job that an editor employed by a publisher will do.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hi nice info Six Reasons Why Everything in Publishing Takes So Long.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Great post, Cheryl, and although publishing is a long process, for all of these reasons, I wouldn't want it any other way. Thank you for writing this.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Thanks very much for this post. It definitely helps while we all continue to write and cultivate patience!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Thank you for taking the time to share the post: while not taking the time of a transcontinental flight, it was still time we appreciate.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Thank you, for the great post and for all you do.

    ReplyDelete
  31. So thoughtful and insightful. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Lovely post. The process should take time, especially when making art.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Cheryl, as always, you say things of great value and in the most eloquent way. Although, to me, this info should be understood simply through common sense (it's a complicated and tedious business!), having it spelled out this way is very helpful, especially to people just beginning their journey into the industry. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  34. I love this post. I adore the honesty. Thank you. And I must say that Second Sight has a permanent place on my nightstand. I refer to it often even though I write romance not young adult fiction. : )

    ReplyDelete
  35. I think that they only way to truly understand the publishing process is to do it. Even if you wish to stay purely an author, it is useful to experience it once. The last couple of years I have been learning the publishing ropes. It has and continues to be a tremendous learning experience. It has rounded me in so many ways and made me a much more confident author.

    ReplyDelete
  36. This article is interesting, accurate and informative. I, for one, have wondered about this.Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  37. A very good and well thought out premise, my thoughts based on what you have said, is as follows. I should keep writing, but dont get too upset when your work hits the proverbial wheels of publishing if they appear to slow down.. I have chosen POD for most of work and my published works are doing okay. My drive is simply because I enjoy telling - spiritual suspense, bibilical stories.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Glad Nathan B. recommended this post!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Thanks for the explanation, and I love that you're so ethical and try so hard. I hope my editor will be just like you. :-)

    However, I don't think it's true for all editors because there are subpar books being published. Even bestselling authors have stinkeroos. Is anyone even bothering to edit them anymore, or does the publisher just want to slap the brand name on and send it out? It sure feels like that sometimes...

    ReplyDelete
  40. Great post!! Very thought provoking :)

    ReplyDelete
  41. Perfectly timed subject, Cheryl. Thanks for taking the time to share your wisdom. Now I'm off to share your post with writer friends asking this very question.
    Jean

    ReplyDelete
  42. I really took the time to read and think about all the things you wrote here. Thank you very much for helping me understand what I am going to face in the near future. I have my first 188 page YA Fantasy Fiction manuscript and am preparing to attend my very first SCBWI conference this weekend.

    ReplyDelete