The rule, right off:
Eliminate “protagonist + sense verb” phrases that make us watch your protagonist have an internal experience, and instead simply dramatize the internal experience.
The sense verbs in question that this usually comes up with are:
- Watch
- Look at
- See
- Hear
- Listen
- Feel
A) Katherine heard a man shout, "LORD GIVE ME PATIENCE!" and spun to see what was happening. She saw that a clown was dancing merrily across the parking lot, a small dog in a red ruff nipping at its heels.
B) "LORD GIVE ME PATIENCE!" a man shouted behind Katherine. She spun to see what was happening. A clown was dancing merrily across the parking lot, a small dog in a red ruff nipping at its heels.
In (A), everything is filtered through Katherine, and having to read about her actions first slows down -- and weighs down -- the action as a whole. In (B), we're presented with what she hears and sees with only the filter of what I call her "sightline": When Katherine looks at something, we see it too, as she's the camera through which we view the action. We don't see the camera in a movie, but instead get to experience what it records for ourselves as if we were there; and the same thing is going on here with (B), so it's more immediate and involving. (B) also has the benefit of eliminating the many repetitions of "Katherine"/"She," forcing the writer to vary the subjects and structure of the sentences and making the prose as a whole more interesting. These tightening and diversifying effects are especially notable with first person:
C) I walked around the corner and saw a woman leaning against the wall, crying. I heard a name repeated over and over through her sobs: "Clarissa . . . Clarissa . . ." I wondered who Clarissa was, and ached as I remembered my own sweet Suzette.
D) I walked around the corner. A woman was leaning against the wall, crying. Her sobs included the same name over and over again: "Clarissa . . . Clarissa . . ." Who was Clarissa? Was this woman mourning her for the same reasons I mourned Suzette?
As you can see from (D), this technique also works with verbs that take place inside the protagonist's brain, including:
- think
- remember
- wonder
- imagine
- realize
- understand
- know
E) Elroy thinks about where he'll be next week at this time: In the mountains, hiking up to the cabin. He remembers smelling the sharp evergreens and listening to the melted snow running in the brook. He imagines catching the first rabbit of spring and how good it will taste roasted.
F) Next week at this time, Elroy will be on the trail to his mountain cabin. The scent of the evergreens will be sharp in his nose and the snowmelt will warble in the brook, just as it has on this hike every year for the last fifteen springs. He can already taste the first rabbit, tender and plump.
With (E), we readers watch Elroy thinking, remembering, imagining. With (F), we skip Elroy altogether and see only his thoughts: where he'll be, how the trail will smell and sound, even the taste of the rabbit. It's much more intense and satisfying, in part because it requires the writer to dramatize that experience in full for us and bring it to life through additional details ("tender and plump").
Of course, the meaning does change from (E) to (F) in a way that points up one caveat to this technique: Sometimes you want readers to see your protagonist engaged in a particular sense or mental activity, as the fact that the protagonist is doing that is equally important to whatever they're experiencing. If you're introducing a flashback, the words "I remember" at the beginning can be enormously useful in orienting the reader to the fact that you're stepping out of the present narrative time; if a character is experiencing an epiphany ("Janie realizes the truth. She never should have left Mike"), the sense verb can reinforce the existence of that epiphany more effectively than a mere statement of the realization.
As with any writing technique, this is a sentence-by-sentence judgment call. But the "protagonist + sense/brain verb" construction is something I ask my writers to take out of their prose probably eighty percent of the time, and it's a quick and effective way to make yourself show, not tell -- to dramatize more, and better. Go forth and cut.
This is like weeding out passive voice, but more like passive acting/emoting.
ReplyDeleteI find that filters crop up when I observe my protagonist rather than become my protagonist. Whenever I write a filter, I know I'm too much in my head rather than absorbed in the heart of the story.
ReplyDeleteJust what I needed this morning! I've got a lot of "sense" words clogging up my WIP. Granted, it's a first draft, but I'll be referring to this post when I start the revisions! Thanks!
ReplyDeleteGreat post with lots of good reminders and examples. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteVery true. Excellent writing is about showing, not telling. It is important to remove your fingerprints from the text so that nothing hinders the reader from fully investing in the story you've woven.
ReplyDeleteCheryl, I'm always so appreciative of the worthwhile, extraordinarily helpful and insightful info you put up for us. Thank you!
ReplyDeletePerfect timing for me during Revising Week/Month/Who Knows how long. Thanks for the clear examples.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I'm encouraging my blog readers to visit your blog and buy your book, Second Sight.
ReplyDeletebookgirlblogger.blogspot.com
Great guidance as I make my way through Revision Land!
ReplyDeleteLOVE this!
ReplyDeleteThis was so helpful, Cheryl. Thank you for posting!
ReplyDeleteThese are awesome, thank you for these great examples. Re, tightening, I might take it one step further on D)
ReplyDeleteD) I walked around the corner. A woman was leaning against the wall, crying. Her sobs included the same name over and over again: "Clarissa . . . Clarissa . . ." Who was Clarissa? Was this woman mourning her for the same reasons I mourned Suzette?
How about... I walked around the corner. A woman leaned against the wall, crying.
Very helpful post. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteWhere are your share buttons? This needs exposure!
ReplyDeleteDonnell, brevity is good but where is Clarissa? If she is the centrepiece of the story, there is no good skipping past her.
ReplyDeletewonderful - I love these very specific, actionable bits! Thanks, Cheryl!
ReplyDeleteGreat post! Thanks for this. I will keep this in mind as I revise my current project. :)
ReplyDeleteGood ideas, those words are speed bumps in the connection between the character and the event.
ReplyDeleteAlthough, Robin has a point, this shouldn't lead to the event squeezing the viewpoint character out of the picture; I also see it's easy to replace the words with more "was"es than you might want. Maybe the full cure is to let the events and the character act more instead of Seeing, with active verbs.
I refer my editing clients to this great post ridiculously often--I need to put it at the top of my bookmarks.
ReplyDelete